Custom Search

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Bear Market rally

As the title suggests, I'm not buying into the notion that we have reached the bottom and it's all smooth sailing from here. I find myself firmly in the camp of the profit takers. What this represents to me is opportunity. If you've made some money here, it's a good time to take something off the table and/or reallocate your portfolio. The thing to remember here is that the fundamentals of the economy haven't changed. In some data, conditions, although not as bad as forecast, are still abysmal. Don't be sucked into the argument that we've turned the corner. Nothing goes either, up or down in a straight line and until now, it's been a free fall for most asset classes. The overall trend for the broader markets is still down.

This is indeed a rally, but a rally in a bear market. This is no different than a bull market sell off.

What I mean here is treat it the same way you would if the markets were doing well and then pulled back. You would add shares on the pull back in price right? The only difference here is that we are given a chance here to either, take some profits from our new investments or recoup some losses from our older, beaten down positions, then reallocate those funds in more profitable sectors.

All of this applies to other assets only. What do I mean by "other assets"?

Everything except gold, silver and anti-dollar investments such as TBT. These things should be accumulated over time because their overall trend is up and fundamentally, that trend is still in place.

I still see serious times ahead, this rally just puts me in a place where I can correct earlier mistakes, such as DOW, sell it off and either, wait to reallocate those funds, after the next leg down, or play the down move with a short position.

So what's the best sell technique here?

Set your stops.

This is the absolute perfect time to use this sell strategy. There are a couple ways to do this, but essentially I'll be letting the market take me out.

Let's look at the DOW trade. First let me repeat, I screwed up on this one. I bought into the old line about buying blue chips and I realise now that the old blue chips are just that, old. But my mistake wasn't in buying DOW, all investors pick losers every now and then. My mistake was in holding DOW as it continued down. The buy and hold mentality took control and I figured that over the long term it was a good acquisition. It may well be, given enough time, but is it the best acquisition?

That's where we let the market decide. I'll be entering a stop loss order. What that means is that it is a conditional order to sell if the price hits a certain price level. In this case I'll dump it if it hits $8.50. Current price is $8.96. That's about 5% down from here and it's a critical support level. This trade will automatically execute with or without me around.

The advantage here is that it removes emotion from the decision. If DOW holds the support level and continues higher the trade doesn't go off and I can participate in an ongoing rally. In that case I would cancel the stop loss order and issue a new one at a higher support level. Or I can issue a trailing stop order which is the same thing, but it works off of percentage drop rather than set price levels and the stop level ratchets up with the price on it's own. I prefer to be more active and use predetermined support levels. But either method works. Your own broker may have different procedures to accomplish these trades, so do your homework and consult with your broker to learn their methods and restrictions.

If, on the other hand, DOW breaks the support level, the trade is automatically entered and executed with no further action from me. I just wake up with a new account balance and no shares of Dow Chemical.



Good luck and Godspeed



JT

Legal disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and is solely the opinion of the writer. Nothing in this post should be considered investment advice. Before investing in anything, the reader is encouraged to do his or her own research and consult with a certified financial advisor, which John Tompkins makes no claim to be. John Tompkins and Toro Creek Investments accept no liability for financial losses or damages incurred by the reader because of this post


Sunday, March 22, 2009

New stuff!

Before getting into the main topic of today's Blog, a quick note on the silver action of the past week; After what appeared to be a bounce off the support level of 12.50, silver looked poised to rally, then it collapsed. What happened?

I don't know for certain, however it looks to be a failed attempt of the short sellers to bring down the price. I'll know more this week as the details unfold.

The interesting thing here is the action of silver after the close in New York on the 18th. After it tumbled during the day, it shot up, as the overseas markets took control. Which leads me to believe that there are some short sellers here in America that are having an Imodium AD moment.

The "gap up" in price tells me that the rest of the world thinks that silver below 12 bucks is too cheap. I agree. Personally I think silver below 50 is too cheap, but only time will tell. Depending on what happens this week, I may do a mid week post, so keep an eye out.

On to our main topic.

KMP and CHK.

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners and Chesapeake Energy Corp.

Here's how these two companies fit into the macro picture. We all witnessed the collapse of the financial sector, and how this took out many people that didn't deserve to get hit. Chesapeake was no different. In fact the CEO of this company literally put his money where his mouth was and was buying massive quantities of his own stock. He, as did many others, misjudged the severity of this downturn and as a result, got called on margin and lost a ton of his personal wealth. What he saw in his company was value, intrinsic and substantial value. They are a natural gas company with first rate drilling and transportation operations. I've been watching this company for years and the thing that attracted me to them in the beginning was the insider trading activity. Some people believe insider trading is illegal, it's not. It just has to be done under close scrutiny by the SEC and in the full light of day. The thing that flagged CHK for me was the fact that all the top people in this company were buying the shares for their personal portfolios, consistently. This is what you look for under normal market conditions, which we are decidedly not seeing right now. But the fact remains that the people in the best position to see the condition of a company, thought pretty highly of CHK before everything tanked. Now if you are of the opinion that a recovery will come some day, as am I, then we want to buy the stuff that is on sale right now and has real tangible value. A look at their chart(which I encourage you to with all stocks) shows that they have stabilised in the 15 to 20 dollar range. As a trader, I'm a buyer in the 15 dollar range and a seller at 20, but for you buy and holders, this is a great one at 15 bucks. I see some great basing action here folks and that just means that they've consolidated nicely. In addition to that, I believe the price of Nat gas is unusually low and as the price climbs, as I think it eventually will, their P/E ratio of 15.5 should plummet, making this company a steal at $15, but if I wanted a long term play, I still think it's a buy under 20. Oh yeah, their 52 week high was $74, cool huh?

Okay let's look at Kinder Morgan.

A very different story but still a Nat gas company with first class assets in place. Their volatility is quite a bit higher so if I wanted to hold this one, I'd buy the dips and avoid watching it every day. That helps cut down on the Tums. As a trader the volatility aspect only makes it more appealing. Another appealing aspect is it's yield, check this out, 9%! And there is little danger of them losing that yield. They have an interesting tax status that requires them to pay out 90% percent of their profits or risk losing exemptions. (It has been some time since I researched that, so don't quote me exactly on the 90%. There are some timber companies with that same tax status so maybe I'll dust off that research and do a blog on that in the future).

KMP's P/E is a little high at 23.6, but in this environment that just indicates that they've got some pretty good institutional support, and again that will drop as pricing power in gas improves.

Their 52 week high is $60.89 so don't expect a home run on this one. conversely their low is $35.59 which indicates some risk to the downside, but with high yielding investments being a rarity these days, I think they are relatively safe.



Good luck and Godspeed



JT


Legal disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and is solely the opinion of the writer. Nothing in this post should be considered investment advice. Before investing in anything, the reader is encouraged to do his or her own research and consult with a certified financial advisor, which John Tompkins makes no claim to be. John Tompkins and Toro Creek Investments accept no liability for financial losses or damages incurred by the reader because of this post

Monday, March 16, 2009

Resistance and Support

It's all about Resistance and support.

I called the top in silver back in my February 22 update at 14.50. The following week, March 2, I called the bottom at 12.50. In both cases I was wrong by 6 cents. I guess in the grand scheme that's not too bad, but what's next?

While no one can know with certainty, things are looking very nice right now. The current price action is encouraging in that, the markets seem to be consolidating nicely in preparation for a new run at the 14.50 resistance.

But lets talk about resistance and support as a concept for a minute. What are they?

Resistance is simply a technical analyst's term for an overbought condition, a condition where market psychology is such that the smart money gets nervous and takes some or all of their profits off the table. It's the "how and why" of the way to make money as a trader.

Support is the other end of the trade. When an asset hits a support level, it is simply another way of saying that the asset is at a fair value at that given time.

Are these indicators always right? of course not. But they are right a majority of the time.

Here is an important point to remember; Each time resistance or support holds, it gets stronger.

Another important point to remember is that, if you can break through resistance, say in this case 14.50, that resistance level becomes the new support level. And the reverse is true as well, if the support level, 12.50, is broken through on the downside, it, in turn becomes the new resistance level.

Important point #3; These concepts hold true in both bull and bear markets, the distinction that needs to be made is that in a bull market support is more likely to hold and resistance is more likely to be broken through. Conversely, in a bear market resistance is the strong one and support is more likely to be broken through.

Sometimes these things happen very quickly and are difficult to spot. But they do happen and whether or not the smart money is creating a self full filling prophecy is irrelevant. This is what they do, it's what they talk about over drinks and it's how they consistently make profits. As small players in an ocean of big fish, we can become big fish too, if we stay out of their way and feed off the scraps of their kills. Does this mean we are scavengers? no, it just means we are smaller smart money.

Here's where I see us right now, I think we will bounce around here for a very short time before moving higher. I will be surprised if we don't break through the 14.50 resistance level and have that in turn become support for a run at 16 bucks. After that we'll wet our finger and see which way the wind is blowing. If 14.50 does hold, it is simply another opportunity to add to our position down to the 12.50 level.

We are still in a bull market correction, but strength is building for a strong upward move.

James Turk is reporting of continuing backwardation in the silver futures market as well as rumors of physical bullion shortages. I'll save the definition of backwardation for another post, but suffice to say for now, this is a very bullish sign for silver.



Good luck and Godspeed



JT

Legal disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and is solely the opinion of the writer. Nothing in this post should be considered investment advice. Before investing in anything, the reader is encouraged to do his or her own research and consult with a certified financial advisor, which John Tompkins makes no claim to be. John Tompkins and Toro Creek Investments accept no liability for financial losses or damages incurred by the reader because of this post.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Is Ted Butler right?

For those of you not familiar with Theodore Butler, he is a former precious metals futures player turned market analyst/crusader. It is his contention, that the precious metals markets are manipulated and the silver market, in particular, has been manipulated down to artificially low prices by large investment banks taking massive short positions. On the other side of the fence his critics claim that his conclusions are fantasy bordering on fanatical. Rather than going through his claims and his reasons, I will let you do the research yourself, Mr. Butler explains it far better than I. http://www.butlerresearch.com/archive_free.html
So is he right?
Yes and No
I tend to come down on the same side of the road as David Morgan of Silver-investor.com. To paraphrase his position, Mr. Morgan believes that the overall market price is not manipulated but it can be temporarily influenced.
My position is similar, mainly because I, as well as other analysts, have been successfully calling the market tops and bottoms through the use of various charting techniques as well as fundamental analysis. This is not to say that the people who may be manipulating aren't using those techniques as well. Of course they are.
Market forces will have their way. Manipulation can only work temporarily, but "temporary" can be a relative thing. It could be weeks, months or years.
Where I find Mr Butlers position to be very useful, is in taking his analysis from the COTs (Commitment of Traders report) data and use it as a confirmation of my technical analysis. If he flags an unusually large build up or spike on the short side at the same time I find overbought or topping indicators, it just strengthens my conviction to put on a trade.
The question remains as to which comes first. Are the manipulators causing the top or are they just taking maximum advantage of technical analysis.
From a moral standpoint I stand firmly behind Mr. Butlers concerns because these banks are not merely taking obscenely large short positions, his contention is, that they are colluding with other shorts to force the price to extremes. These are not the actions that can be allowed in a free market. So his crusading, as some have called it, is a just cause.
That the regulators at the CFTC are not responsive to this issue, is of course, to be expected. Having worked for the government for so long, it comes as no great surprise that there is incompetence in the government and this ineptness, actually lends credibility to Mr. Butlers arguments.
Illegal activity right under the nose of regulators?
Can anyone say Bernie Madoff?
Stick to your analysis and look to all sources for information. It is a mistake to dismiss Mr Butlers analysis as fantasy. Puzzle pieces often take on strange and unfamiliar shapes, but when correctly put together, can present a very pretty picture.

Good Luck and Godspeed

JT

Monday, March 2, 2009

Nothing new. Metals are still the place to be.

Here's the scoop; There isn't one. At least nothing new.

As I pointed out last week both gold and silver were up against strong resistance and probably, could not break through. Look for a consolidation period here before they continue their upward trends. I am sticking with 850 support for gold and 12.50 for silver. These are my buy levels. If they break below these levels we could be in for another dance with 11 bucks and 750, but I view that as highly unlikely. With current world economic events, I see a much more likely chance that they will turn around even before those support levels and resume their climb.
In times like these, I would worry about the future for precious metals, if the Government was doing anything that would strengthen the dollar. They are not. In fact the inverse is true.
If I were writing a strategy to ruin the dollar, I would be advocating everything the government is doing, as well as what they are planning on doing.

This is not a criticism of President Obama, it is a criticism of all politicians, past and present from both sides of the isle. It would be charitable for me to say that they are just uneducated in monetary history. They know, but they are saying that "this time is different".
For almost a hundred years, politicians have refused to acknowledge history's precedents.
Rather than going through examples, suffice to say, that no country has ever successfully debased their currency.
Our founding fathers were mindful of past monetary catastrophes, that is why they spelled out, very carefully, what a dollar is. When we departed from that definition, we set ourselves on a path, the destination of which, is the destruction of the dollar. Can we turn from that path and save our currency?
Probably not. In fact the opposite is true, as I already stated, I couldn't come up with a better plan to destroy the once mighty Greenback, than what our leaders are doing. Not only are they continuing past practices, the are ramping up debt at a geometrical pace, with monetary supply following closely behind.
From psychology we know that true and lasting change will not come without a "significant emotional event", and we have yet to see that happen. It's beginning but, unfortunately, much more economic pain has to occur before that significance can be realised.
Back to the gold standard?
Yes, but I realize that in our current climate, that will not happen. The entire world will have to realize the necessity of a currency backed by silver and gold, and again, that will not happen without a world wide "significant emotional event".
Am I hoping for it to happen?
Absolutely not.
In fact, I would give away every ounce of silver and gold, as well as every dollar I have, to avoid it and return to our previous standard of living. But that would do no good. Instead I am trying to get friends and family to prepare for the hurricane ahead.
I am, by nature, an optimist. I know that sounds strange following my dire predictions, but I do think we will find a way out of this and my optimism is illustrated by the belief that I will emerge from the future events in much better shape than I am entering them, but not without being prepared.
As Doug Casey from Casey research is fond of saying "Rig for stormy weather!"

Good Luck and Godspeed

JT

Legal disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and is solely the opinion of the writer. Nothing in this post should be considered investment advice. Before investing in anything, the reader is encouraged to do his or her own research and consult with a certified financial advisor, which John Tompkins makes no claim to be. John Tompkins and Toro Creek Investments accept no liability for financial losses or damages incurred by the reader because of this post.